Smart Optimistic Rollups
Rollups play a crucial part in providing next-generation scaling on Tezos. This page gives a technical introduction to smart rollups, their optimistic nature, and an intro to developing your own WASM kernel.
Prerequisites
This page covers an advanced topic at the bleeding edge of Tezos core development. If you are interested in more fundamental reading, a great place to start is Tezos Protocol and Shell and Smart Contracts.
Examples
For examples of smart rollups, see this repository: https://gitlab.com/tezos/kernel-gallery.
What is a rollup?
A rollup is a processing unit that receives, retrieves, and interprets input messages to update its local state and to produce output messages targeting the Tezos blockchain. In this documentation, we will generally refer to the rollup under consideration as the Layer 2 on top of the Tezos blockchain, considered as layer 1.
Rollups are a permissionless scaling solution for the Tezos blockchain. Indeed, anyone can originate and operate one or more rollups, allowing to increase the throughput of the Tezos blockchain, (almost) arbitrarily.
The integration of these rollups in the Tezos protocol is optimistic: this means that when an operator publishes a claim about the state of the rollup, this claim is a priori trusted. However, a refutation mechanism allows anyone to economically punish a participant who has published an invalid claim. Therefore, thanks to the refutation mechanism, a single honest participant is enough to guarantee that the input messages are correctly interpreted.
In the Tezos protocol, the subsystem of smart rollups is generic with respect to the syntax and the semantics of the input messages. More precisely, the originator of a smart rollup provides a program (in one of the languages supported by Tezos) responsible for interpreting input messages. During the refutation mechanism, the execution of this program is handled by a proof-generating virtual machine (PVM) for this language, provided by the Tezos protocol, which allows to prove that the result of applying an input message to the rollup context is correct. The rest of the time, any VM implementation of the chosen language can be used to run the smart rollup program, provided that it is compliant with the PVM.
The smart rollup infrastructure currently supports the WebAssembly language. A WASM rollup runs a WASM program named a kernel. The role of the kernel is to process input messages, to update a state, and to output messages targeting layer 1 following a user-defined logic.
Anyone can develop a kernel or reuse existing kernels. A typical use case of WASM rollups is to deploy a kernel that implements the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) and to get as a result an EVM-compatible Layer 2 running on top of the Tezos blockchain. WASM rollups are not limited to this use case though: they are fully programmable, hence their names, smart optimistic rollups, as they are very close to smart contracts in terms of expressiveness.
The purpose of this documentation is to give:
- an overview of the terminology and basic principles of smart rollups
- a complete tour of smart rollups related workflows
- a reference documentation for the development of a WASM kernel.
Overview
Just like smart contracts, smart rollups are decentralized software components. However, contrary to smart contracts that are processed by the network validators automatically, a smart rollup requires a dedicated rollup node to function.
Any user can originate, operate, and interact with a rollup. For the sake of clarity, we will distinguish three kinds of users in this documentation: operators, kernel developers, and end-users. An operator deploys the rollup node to make the rollup progress. A kernel developer writes a kernel to be executed within a rollup. An end-user interacts with the rollup through layer 1 operations or Layer 2 input messages.
Address
When a smart rollup is originated on layer 1, a unique address is
generated to uniquely identify it. A smart rollup address starts with
the prefix sr1
.
Inputs
There are two channels of communication to interact with smart rollups:
- a global rollups inbox allows layer 1 to transmit information to all the rollups. This unique inbox contains two kinds of messages: external messages are pushed through a layer 1 manager operation while internal messages are pushed by layer 1 smart contracts or the protocol itself.
- a reveal data channel allows the rollup to retrieve data coming from data sources external to layer 1.
External messages
Anyone can push a message to the rollups inbox. This message is a mere sequence of bytes following no particular underlying format. The interpretation of this sequence of bytes is the responsibility of each kernel.
There are two ways for end-users to push an external message to the rollups inbox: first, they can inject the dedicated layer 1 operation using the Octez client second, they can use the batcher of a smart rollup node (see Sending an External Inbox Message).
Internal messages
Contrary to external messages, which are submitted by the end users, internal messages are constructed by layer 1.
At the beginning of every Tezos block, layer 1 pushes two internal messages:
"Start of level"
- no associated payload"Info per level"
- provides to the kernel the timestamp and block hash of the predecessor of the current Tezos block.
A rollup is identified by an address and has an associated Michelson type (defined at origination time). Any layer 1 smart contract can perform a transfer to this address with a payload of this type. This transfer is realized as an internal message pushed to the rollups inbox.
Finally, after the application of the operations of the Tezos block, the layer 1 pushes one final internal message "End of level"
. Similarly to "Start of level"
, this internal messages does not come with any payload.
Reveal data channel
The reveal data channel is a communication interface that allows the rollup to request data from sources that are external to the inbox and can be unknown to layer 1. The rollup node has the responsibility to answer the rollup requests.
A rollup can do the following requests through the reveal data channel:
- preimage requests: The rollup can request arbitrary data of at most 4kBytes, provided that it knows its (blake2b) hash. The request is fulfilled by the rollup node (see Populating the Reveal Channel).
- metadata requests: The rollup can request information from the protocol, namely the address and the origination level of the rollup node itself. The rollup node retrieves this information through RPCs to answer the rollup.
Information passing through the reveal data channel does not have to be considered by layer 1: for this reason, the volume of information is not limited by the bandwidth of layer 1. Thus, the reveal data channel can be used to upload large volumes of data to the rollup.
Origination
When originated, a rollup is characterized by the name of the device it runs, the proof-generating virtual machine (PVM), by the source code of the rollup running under this device, and by the Michelson type of the entrypoint used by layer 1 smart contracts to communicate with the rollup through internal messages.
Processing
Each time a Tezos block is finalized, a rollup reacts to three kinds of events: the beginning of the block, the input messages contained in that block, and the end of the block. A rollup node implements this reactive process: it downloads the Tezos block and interprets it according to the semantics of the PVM. This interpretation can require updating a state, downloading data from other sources, or performing some cryptographic verifications. The state of the rollup contains an outbox, a sequence of latent calls to layer 1 contracts.
The behavior of the rollup node is deterministic and fully specified by a reference implementation of the PVM embedded in the protocol. Notice that the PVM implementation is meant for verification, not performance: for this reason, a rollup node does not normally run a PVM to process inputs but a fast execution engine (e.g., WASMER for the WASM PVM in the case of the rollup node distributed with Octez). This fast execution engine implements the exact same semantics as the PVM.
Commitments
Starting from the rollup origination level, levels are partitioned into commitment periods of 60 consecutive blocks.
A commitment claims that the interpretation of all inbox messages published during a given commitment period and applied on the state of a parent commitment leads to a given new state by performing a given number of execution steps of the PVM. Execution steps are called ticks in the smart rollups terminology. A commitment must be published on the layer 1 after each commitment period to have the rollup progress. A commitment is always based on a parent commitment (except for the genesis commitment that is automatically published at origination time).
Since the PVM is deterministic and the inputs are completely determined by layer 1 rollups inbox and the reveal channel, there is only one honest commitment. In other words, if two distinct commitments are published for the same commitment period, one of them must be wrong.
Notice that, to publish a commitment, an operator must provide a deposit of 10,000 tez. For this reason, the operator is said to be a staker. Several users can stake on the same commitment. When a staker S publishes a new commitment based on a commitment S is staking on, S does not have to provide a new deposit: the deposit also applies to this new commitment.
There is no need to synchronize between operators: if two honest operators publish the same commitment for a given commitment period, the commitment will be published with two stakes on it.
A commitment is optimistically trusted but it can be refuted until it is said to be cemented (i.e., final, unchangeable). Indeed, right after a commitment is published, a two-weeks refutation period starts. During the refutation period, anyone noticing that a commitment for a given commitment period is invalid can post a concurrent commitment for the same commitment period to force the removal of the invalid commitment. If no one posts such a concurrent commitment during the refutation period, the commitment can be cemented with a dedicated operation injected in layer 1, and the outbox messages can be executed by the layer 1 by an explicit layer 1 operation typically to transfer assets from the rollup to layer 1 (see Triggering Execution of an Outbox Message).
Refutation
Because of concurrent commitments, a rollup is generally related to a commitment tree where branches correspond to different claims about the rollup state.
By construction, only one view of the rollup state is valid (as the PVM is deterministic). When two concurrent branches exist in the commitment tree, the cementation process is stopped at the first fork in the tree. To unfreeze the cementation process, a refutation game must be started between two concurrent stakers of these branches. Refutation games are automatically played by rollup nodes to defend their stakes: honest participants are guaranteed to win these games. Therefore, an honest participant should not have to worry about refutation games. Finally, a running refutation game does not prevent new commitments to be published on top of the disputed commitments.
A refutation game is decomposed into two main steps: a dissection mechanism and a final conflict resolution phase. During the first phase, the two stakers exchange hashes about intermediate states of the rollups in a way that allows them to converge to the very first tick on which they disagree. The exact number of hashes exchanged at a given step is PVM-dependent. During the final phase, the stakers must provide a proof that they correctly interpreted this conflicting tick.
The layer 1 PVM then determines whether these proofs are valid. There are only two possible outcomes: either one of the staker has provided a valid proof, then that staker wins the game, and is rewarded with half of the opponent's deposit (the other half being burnt); or, both stakers have provided an invalid proof and they both lose their deposit. In the end, at most one stake will be kept in the commitment tree. When a commitment has no more stake on it (because all stakers have lost the related refutation games), it is removed from the tree. An honest player H must therefore play as many refutation games as there are stakes on the commitments in conflict with H's own commitment.
Finally, notice that each player is subject to a timer similar to a chess clock, allowing each player to play only up to one week: after this time is elapsed, a player can be dismissed by any layer 1 user playing a timeout operation. Thus, the refutation game played by the two players can last at most 2 weeks.
There is no timeout for starting a refutation game after having published a concurrent commitment. However, assuming the existence of an honest participant, that participant will start the refutation game with all concurrent stakers to avoid the rollup being stuck.
Workflows
Tools
Smart rollups come with two new executable programs: the Octez rollup node and the Octez rollup client.
The Octez rollup node is used by a rollup operator to deploy a rollup. The rollup node is responsible for making the rollup progress by publishing commitments and by playing refutation games.
Just like the Octez node, the Octez rollup node provides an RPC
interface RPC <../api/openapi>
. The
services of this interface can be called directly with HTTP requests or
indirectly using the Octez rollup client.
Prerequisites
An Octez rollup node needs an Octez node to run. We assume that an Octez node has been launched locally:
octez-node config init --data-dir "${ONODE_DIR}" --network "${NETWORK}"
octez-node run --data-dir "${ONODE_DIR}" --network "${NETWORK}" --rpc-addr 127.0.0.1
Finally, you need to check that your balance is greater than 10,000 tez to make sure that staking is possible. If your balance is not sufficient, you can get test tokens from a faucet.
octez-client get balance for "${OPERATOR_ADDR}"
Origination
Anyone can originate a smart rollup with the following invocation of the Octez client:
octez-client originate smart rollup "${SOR_ALIAS}" \
from "${OPERATOR_ADDR}" \
of kind wasm_2_0_0 \
of type bytes \
with kernel "${KERNEL}" \
--burn-cap 999
where ${SOR_ALIAS}
is an alias to memorize the smart rollup address in the client. This alias can be used in any command where a smart rollup address is expected. ${KERNEL}
is a hex representation of a WebAssembly bytecode serving as an initial program to boot on.
You can obtain this representation through the WASM bytecode file named kernel.wasm
:
xxd -ps -c 0 <kernel.wasm> | tr -d '\n'
To experiment, we propose that you use the value ${KERNEL}
defined in the file sr_boot_kernel.sh
.
source sr_boot_kernel.sh
If everything went well, the origination command results in:
This sequence of operations was run:
Manager signed operations:
From: tz1fp5ncDmqYwYC568fREYz9iwQTgGQuKZqX
Fee to the baker: ꜩ0.000357
Expected counter: 36
Gas limit: 1000
Storage limit: 0 bytes
Balance updates:
tz1fp5ncDmqYwYC568fREYz9iwQTgGQuKZqX ... -ꜩ0.000357
payload fees(the block proposer) ....... +ꜩ0.000357
Revelation of manager public key:
Contract: tz1fp5ncDmqYwYC568fREYz9iwQTgGQuKZqX
Key: edpkukxtw4fHmffj4wtZohVKwNwUZvYm6HMog5QMe9EyYK3QwRwBjp
This revelation was successfully applied
Consumed gas: 1000
Manager signed operations:
From: tz1fp5ncDmqYwYC568fREYz9iwQTgGQuKZqX
Fee to the baker: ꜩ0.000956
Expected counter: 37
Gas limit: 2849
Storage limit: 6572 bytes
Balance updates:
tz1fp5ncDmqYwYC568fREYz9iwQTgGQuKZqX ... -ꜩ0.000956
payload fees(the block proposer) ....... +ꜩ0.000956
Smart rollup origination:
Kind: wasm_2_0_0
Parameter type: bytes
Kernel Blake2B hash: '24df9e3c520dd9a9c49b447766e8a604d31138c1aacb4a67532499c6a8b348cc'
This smart rollup origination was successfully applied
Consumed gas: 2748.269
Storage size: 6552 bytes
Address: sr1RYurGZtN8KNSpkMcCt9CgWeUaNkzsAfXf
Genesis commitment hash: src13wCGc2nMVfN7rD1rgeG3g1q7oXYX2m5MJY5ZRooVhLt7JwKXwX
Balance updates:
tz1fp5ncDmqYwYC568fREYz9iwQTgGQuKZqX ... -ꜩ1.638
storage fees ........................... +ꜩ1.638
The address sr1RYurGZtN8KNSpkMcCt9CgWeUaNkzsAfXf
is the smart rollup
address. Let's refer to it as ${SOR_ADDR}
from now on.
Deploying a rollup node
Now that the rollup is originated, anyone can deploy a rollup node to advance the rollup.
First, we need to decide on a directory where the rollup node stores its data. Let us assign this path to ${ROLLUP_NODE_DIR}
.
The rollup node can be run with:
octez-smart-rollup-node-alpha --base-dir "${OCLIENT_DIR}" \
run operator for "${SOR_ALIAS_OR_ADDR}" \
with operators "${OPERATOR_ADDR}" \
--data-dir "${ROLLUP_NODE_DIR}"
The log should show that the rollup node follows layer 1 chain and is processing the inbox of each level.
Distinct layer 1 addresses could be used for layer 1
operations issued by the rollup node simply by editing the configuration file to set different addresses for publish
add_messages
cement
refute
.
In addition, a rollup node can run under different modes:
operator
activates a full-fledged rollup node. This means that the rollup node will do everything needed to make the rollup progress. This includes following layer 1 chain, reconstructing inboxes, updating the states, publishing and cementing commitments regularly, and playing the refutation games. In this mode, the rollup node will accept transactions in its queue and batch them on layer 1.batcher
means that the rollup node will accept transactions in its queue and batch them on layer 1. In this mode, the rollup node follows layer 1 chain, but it does not update its state and does not reconstruct inboxes. Consequently, it does not publish commitments nor play refutation games.observer
means that the rollup node follows layer 1 chain to reconstruct inboxes, to update its state. However, it will neither publish commitments, nor play a refutation game. It does not include the message batching service either.maintenance
is the same as the operator mode except that it does not include the message batching service.accuser
follows thelayer1-chain
and computes commitments but does not publish them. Only when a conflicting commitment (published by another staker) is detected will the "accuser node" publish a commitment and participate in the subsequent refutation game.
The following table summarizes the operation modes, focusing on the L1 operations which are injected by the rollup node in each mode.
Add Messages | Publish | Cement | Refute | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Operator | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Batcher | Yes | No | No | No |
Observer | No | No | No | No |
Maintenance | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Accuser | No | Yes* | No | Yes |
An accuser node will publish commitments only when it detects conflicts. In this case, it must deposit 10,000 tez.
Configuration file
The rollup node can also be configured with the following command that
uses the same arguments as the run
command:
octez-smart-rollup-node-alpha --base-dir "${OCLIENT_DIR}" \
init operator config for "${SOR_ALIAS_OR_ADDR}" \
with operators "${OPERATOR_ADDR}" \
--data-dir "${ROLLUP_NODE_DIR}"
This creates a configuration file at ${ROLLUP_NODE_DIR}/config.json
:
{
"data-dir": "${ROLLUP_NODE_DIR}",
"smart-rollup-address": "${SOR_ADDR}",
"smart-rollup-node-operator": {
"publish": "${OPERATOR_ADDR}",
"add_messages": "${OPERATOR_ADDR}",
"cement": "${OPERATOR_ADDR}",
"refute": "${OPERATOR_ADDR}"
},
"fee-parameters": {},
"mode": "operator"
}
The rollup node can now be run with:
octez-smart-rollup-node-alpha -d "${OCLIENT_DIR}" run --data-dir ${ROLLUP_NODE_DIR}
The configuration will be read from ${ROLLUP_NODE_DIR}/config.json
.
Rollup node in a sandbox
The node can also be tested locally with a sandbox environment.
Once you initialized the sandboxed client data with:
./src/bin_client/octez-init-sandboxed-client.sh
You can run a sandboxed rollup node with:
`octez-smart-rollup-node-Pt${CURRENT_PROTOCOL} run`.
where ${CURRENT_PROTOCOL}
represents the current latest protocol i.e. PtMumbai
, PtNairob
etc.
A temporary directory /tmp/tezos-smart-rollup-node.xxxxxxxx
will be
used. However, a specific data directory can be set with the environment variable SCORU_DATA_DIR
.
Sending an External Inbox Message
The Octez client can be used to send an external message into the rollup inbox. Assuming that ${EMESSAGE}
is the hexadecimal representation of the message payload, to inject an external message, run:
octez-client" -d "${OCLIENT_DIR}" -p Pt${CURRENT_PROTOCOL} \
send smart rollup message "hex:[ \"${EMESSAGE}\" ]" \
from "${OPERATOR_ADDR}"
Let's now produce some viable contents for ${EMESSAGE}
. The kernel used previously in our running example is a simple "echo" kernel that copies its input as a new message to its outbox. Therefore, the input must be a valid binary encoding of an outbox message to make this work.
Specifically, assuming that we have originated a layer 1 smart contract as follows:
octez-client -d "${OCLIENT_DIR}" -p Pt${CURRENT_PROTOCOL} \
originate contract go transferring 1 from "${OPERATOR_ADDR}" \
running 'parameter string; storage string; code {CAR; NIL operation; PAIR};' \
--init '""' --burn-cap 0.4
and that this contract is identified by a address ${CONTRACT}
, then
one can encode an outbox transaction using the Octez rollup client as
follows:
MESSAGE='[ { \
"destination" : "${CONTRACT}", \
"parameters" : "\"Hello world\"", \
"entrypoint" : "%default" } ]'
EMESSAGE=$(octez-smart-rollup-client-Pt${CURRENT_PROTOCOL} encode outbox message "${MESSAGE}")
Triggering Execution of an Outbox Message
Once an outbox message has been pushed to the outbox by the kernel at
some level ${L}
, the user needs to wait for the commitment that includes this level to be cemented. On dailynet, the cementation process
of a non-disputed commitment is 40 blocks long while on Mainnet, it is 2
weeks long.
When the commitment is cemented, one can observe that the outbox is populated as follows:
octez-smart-rollup-client-Pt${CURRENT_PROTOCOL} rpc get \
/global/block/cemented/outbox/${L}/messages
Here is the output for this command:
[ { "outbox_level": ${L}, "message_index": "0",
"message":
{ "transactions":
[ { "parameters": { "string": "Hello world" },
"destination": "${CONTRACT}",
"entrypoint": "%default" } ] } } ]
At this point, the actual execution of a given outbox message can be triggered. This requires precomputing a proof that this outbox message is indeed in the outbox. In the case of our running example, this proof is retrieved as follows:
PROOF=$(octez-smart-rollup-client-Pt${CURRENT_PROTOCOL} get proof for message 0 \
of outbox at level "${L}" \
transferring "${MESSAGE}")
Finally, the execution of the outbox message is done as follows:
"${TEZOS_PATH}/octez-client" -d "${OCLIENT_DIR}" -p Pt${CURRENT_PROTOCOL} \
execute outbox message of smart rollup "${SOR_ALIAS_OR_ADDR}" \
from "${OPERATOR_ADDR}" for commitment hash "${LCC}" \
and output proof "${PROOF}"
where ${LCC}
is the hash of the latest cemented commitment.
Anyone can trigger the execution of an outbox message (not only an operator).
To check the contract has indeed been called with the parameter Hello World
through an internal operation, we can check the receipt. More complex parameters, typically assets represented as tickets,
can be used as long as they match the type of the entrypoint of the
destination smart contract.
Sending An Internal Inbox Message
A smart contract can push an internal message in the rollup inbox using
the Michelson TRANSFER_TOKENS
instruction targeting a specific rollup
address. The parameter of this transfer must be a value of the Michelson type declared at the origination of this rollup.
Remember that our running example rollup has been originated with:
octez-client originate smart rollup "${SOR_ALIAS}" \
from "${OPERATOR_ADDR}" \
of kind wasm_2_0_0 \
of type bytes \
booting with "${KERNEL}" \
-burn-cap 999
The fragment of type bytes
declares that the rollup is expecting values of type bytes
. Any Michelson type could have been used. To transfer tickets to a rollup, this type must
mention tickets.
Here is an example of a Michelson script that sends an internal message
to the rollup of our running example. The payload of the internal
message is the value passed as parameter of type bytes
to the rollup.
parameter bytes;
storage unit;
code
{
UNPAIR;
PUSH address "${SOR_ADDR}";
CONTRACT bytes;
IF_NONE { PUSH string "Invalid address"; FAILWITH } {};
PUSH mutez 0;
DIG 2;
TRANSFER_TOKENS;
NIL operation;
SWAP;
CONS;
PAIR;
}